Historical top-ranking days across our boards
VERIFIED BY INDIE PLEDGE • DATA SOURCES: APP STORE & GITHUB
Click to generate AI insights based on current signals
Reputation 44.0 → 56.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Corrected reputation 56.0 → 44.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: Bug report rate rose from 50% to 100%
Corrected score 15. Current score basis: 近90天仅有 1 次有效更新; 距最近一次有效更新 80 天; 节奏样本不足,已将该维度权重转移到频率与新鲜度.
Reputation 44.0 → 56.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Current score -32. Score basis: 1 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 6; 76 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -40; Settled in Qudao +2.
Reputation 56.0 → 44.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: Bug report rate rose from 50% to 100%
Corrected reputation 50.0 → 56.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Corrected score -20. Current score basis: 1 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 6; 69 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -28; Settled in Qudao +2.
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Corrected score 36. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Reputation 50.0 → 100.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Reputation 50.0 → 100.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Reputation 50.0 → 100.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Corrected score 45. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 51. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 53. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 63. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 69. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高.
新增AI一键填写说明书信息 优化公共库搜索
Corrected score 53. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 63. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 69. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高.
Corrected score 68. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 无公开路线图.
优化AI搜索增加RAG功能 支持对PDF文件的问答 公共库列表加载策略优化 设置页增加反馈渠道 进一步优化图片压缩机制 增加了一些类别标签 修复了一些UI显示的bug
支持买断制 增加保存图片时的上传提示 优化搜索机制 支持上传pdf、txt等格式的说明书 加入邀请码机制,邀请用户可免费使用会员 上传到公共库获得积分,积分可以免费使用会员功能 优化图片压缩机制 优化图片缓存机制,提高打开速度
Version 1.0 released
Curated from App Store “Most Helpful” reviews. Opinions belong to their authors.
为什么只能是图片呢?这样太不合理了。很多可以从产品官网下载的说明书都是pdf格式的。建议多支持一些格式类型,比如pdf、txt等。
感谢您的宝贵建议,新版本中加入了PDF txt格式的支持
终于不用一个一个找说明书了!
Please login to join the discussion
Login