Historical top-ranking days across our boards
VERIFIED BY INDIE PLEDGE • DATA SOURCES: APP STORE & GITHUB
结合近期多维信号,生成贴近当前阶段的辅助判断
Reputation 44.0 → 56.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Corrected reputation 56.0 → 44.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: Bug report rate rose from 50% to 100%
Corrected score 15. Current score basis: 近90天仅有 1 次有效更新; 距最近一次有效更新 80 天; 节奏样本不足,已将该维度权重转移到频率与新鲜度.
Reputation 44.0 → 56.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Current score -32. Score basis: 1 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 6; 76 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -40; Settled in Qudao +2.
Reputation 56.0 → 44.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: Bug report rate rose from 50% to 100%
Corrected reputation 50.0 → 56.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Corrected score -20. Current score basis: 1 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 6; 69 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -28; Settled in Qudao +2.
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Corrected score 36. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Reputation 50.0 → 100.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Reputation 50.0 → 100.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Reputation 50.0 → 100.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4)
Reputation 100.0 → 50.0, rating 4.75 → 4.75 (reviews 4). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Corrected score 45. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 51. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 53. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 63. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 69. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高.
新增AI一键填写说明书信息 优化公共库搜索
Corrected score 53. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 63. Current score basis: 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高; 无公开路线图. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 69. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; App Store 评分较高.
Corrected score 68. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 无公开路线图.
优化AI搜索增加RAG功能 支持对PDF文件的问答 公共库列表加载策略优化 设置页增加反馈渠道 进一步优化图片压缩机制 增加了一些类别标签 修复了一些UI显示的bug
支持买断制 增加保存图片时的上传提示 优化搜索机制 支持上传pdf、txt等格式的说明书 加入邀请码机制,邀请用户可免费使用会员 上传到公共库获得积分,积分可以免费使用会员功能 优化图片压缩机制 优化图片缓存机制,提高打开速度
Version 1.0 released
摘自 App Store 「最有用」评论,仅作参考,评论归原作者所有。
为什么只能是图片呢?这样太不合理了。很多可以从产品官网下载的说明书都是pdf格式的。建议多支持一些格式类型,比如pdf、txt等。
感谢您的宝贵建议,新版本中加入了PDF txt格式的支持
终于不用一个一个找说明书了!
Please login to join the discussion
Login