VERIFIED BY INDIE PLEDGE • DATA SOURCES: APP STORE & GITHUB
结合近期多维信号,生成贴近当前阶段的辅助判断
Reputation 68.0 → 70.0, rating 4.36 → 4.36 (reviews 11)
Corrected score 44. Current score basis: 近90天仅有 3 次有效更新; 距最近一次有效更新 33 天; 节奏样本不足,已将该维度权重转移到频率与新鲜度. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Reputation 70.0 → 68.0, rating 4.36 → 4.36 (reviews 11). Reason: Bug report rate rose from 40% to 50%
Corrected score 45. Current score basis: 近90天仅有 3 次有效更新; 距最近一次有效更新 32 天; 节奏样本不足,已将该维度权重转移到频率与新鲜度. This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 46. Current score basis: 近90天仅有 3 次有效更新; 距最近一次有效更新 31 天; 节奏样本不足,已将该维度权重转移到频率与新鲜度.
Reputation 70.0 → 70.0, rating 4.30 → 4.36 (reviews 11)
Current score 22. Score basis: 4 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 27; 24 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -5.
Current score 29. Score basis: 5 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 34; 22 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -5.
Corrected reputation 40.0 → 70.0, rating 4.30 → 4.30 (reviews 10)
Corrected score 32. Current score basis: 5 effective updates in the last 90 days, base activity score 34; 20 days since the latest effective update, staleness penalty -2.
Corrected score 58. Current score basis: 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%); Bug 反馈率较高 (40%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Reputation 60.0 → 40.0, rating 4.30 → 4.30 (reviews 10). Reason: The reputation pullback was caused by a shift in the review sample structure
Reputation 40.0 → 60.0, rating 4.30 → 4.30 (reviews 10)
- 网格模式 - 修复Bug
Corrected score 64. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%).
Corrected score 58. Current score basis: 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%); Bug 反馈率较高 (44%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
Corrected score 67. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 无公开路线图.
- 修复Bug
Corrected score 66. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%).
- 修复Bug
Corrected score 59. Current score basis: 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%); Bug 反馈率较高 (20%). This rollback reflects recalculation under the latest rules, not that frequent updates caused the deduction.
- Bug fixes
Corrected score 66. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%).
Corrected score 65. Current score basis: 近期有更新; 暂无评分; 开发者积极回复 Bug (100%).
- Bug fixes
- 优化Snippo体验
- 修复Bug
- 修复bug
- 修复Bug
- 修复bug
- 支持更多的主题 - 关闭分词搜索 - 优化iPad和Mac
- 支持iOS 26
- 支持 iOS 26
- 支持Live Photo - 修复Bug
- 支持实况照片 - 修复Bug
- 拖拽图片排序 - 搜索作者 - 展示缓存大小 - 修复Bug
- 拖拽排序图片 - 修复Bug
- 支持网易云音乐 - 修复无法分享
- 支持网易云音乐 - 修复无法分享
- 显示笔记时间 - 随机回顾 - 优化体验
- 搜索标签 - 修复Bug
- 添加评论 - 修改内容
- 添加评论 - 修改内容
- 支持大众点评
- 支持繁体中文搜索 - 修复Bug
- 视频横竖屏 - 修复Bug
- 导出Markdown
- 支持搜索 - 图片布局 - 更换字体 - 修复了些bug
- 优化iPad和Mac的显示 - 图片下载 - 修复Bug
摘自 App Store 「最有用」评论,仅作参考,评论归原作者所有。
目前体验整体感觉就是:方便👍🏻。唯一不足就是目前卡片太大,希望开发者可以考虑多种视图的选择,如Notion的列表、画廊视图等
感谢反馈,这个我去参考下Notion等App,看后续是不是加上
根本点不开 —— 9.9还是点不开!闪退
我觉得snippo是我目前用的最好用的,而且兼具了苹果视觉的完美。但希望借鉴notion或picseed或cubox的分类功能,这样可以提升鉴藏一个新高度。不然只靠标签有些单薄。加油哇
希望能出个分类功能,只有标签还是太单一了。全都堆在主页的话有点奇怪,分类➕标签就很完美了,排版也很美观
到底在哪里可以买会员🥲
你好,这是个bug,在最新版本中修复了
Please login to join the discussion
Login